gaz
03-16 02:16 PM
He's not my lawyer. I just hear of him out here in the various posts.
As for the things you ask below - why should he do any of the things you ask for - its none of his business. Or actually, its none of our business to tell him how to conduct his business.
Don't want to get into a mudslinging fest here - just wanted to point out that sometimes posts like the original one are useful.
You can do hero worship of your lawyer whoever it is. I will not.
Ask him/her if he will do advocacy effort for you or sue USCIS since all his clients are struggling in the long wait and spending a lot of money on immigration consultations, fees etc.
Ask him if he contribute to IV instead?
Ask him to give you priority instead of your employer who gives him business every year.
As for the things you ask below - why should he do any of the things you ask for - its none of his business. Or actually, its none of our business to tell him how to conduct his business.
Don't want to get into a mudslinging fest here - just wanted to point out that sometimes posts like the original one are useful.
You can do hero worship of your lawyer whoever it is. I will not.
Ask him/her if he will do advocacy effort for you or sue USCIS since all his clients are struggling in the long wait and spending a lot of money on immigration consultations, fees etc.
Ask him if he contribute to IV instead?
Ask him to give you priority instead of your employer who gives him business every year.
wallpaper Leaked, christina aguilera
Gclong
07-20 01:16 PM
Thanks very much for your advice.
Will try to get the affidavit asap.
I have to send the original of birth certificate or a copy will do?
Gclong
Will try to get the affidavit asap.
I have to send the original of birth certificate or a copy will do?
Gclong
gcfordesi
04-23 01:00 AM
My employer was trying to scare me saying AC-21 is trouble there will be lot of queries about title ,wages etc.... Still i am going ahead
Just wanted to say that you are not alone here Lets take a chance its any day better than staying with this greedy employers in this recession time .
Just wanted to say that you are not alone here Lets take a chance its any day better than staying with this greedy employers in this recession time .
2011 Christina Aguilera is the
raghav0
11-22 08:58 AM
I agree with the majority of the posts here that talk about bickering and infighting that we have as opposed to remaining focused on our common goal. Just because someone had a bright spark that people with Masters should get Green Cards, is the USCIS going to honor that and change the rules to benefit us? I think we need to remain patient and focused on the job at hand. i.e - supporting the IV front liners and having a single voice which boldly and clearly talks of expediting the green card process. If we are not going to to act in unison, we are the biggest losers!
FYI - I have been in the country long enough and have gone through the pain of bungling lawyers and unresponsive management..so its not that I choose to be +ve since I haven't had any bad experience with this process!!
FYI - I have been in the country long enough and have gone through the pain of bungling lawyers and unresponsive management..so its not that I choose to be +ve since I haven't had any bad experience with this process!!
more...
LostInGCProcess
03-03 12:53 PM
jung.lee,I'd appreciate if you could please respond to my PM whenever you can. Thanks.
goel_ar
05-11 03:57 PM
Below is data of PD from last four years for EB2-I - only for Jun, Jul & Aug.
Except July Fiasco , I don't see dates ever moving forward in July VB; but they do move in August VB.
Has anything changed in spillover laws in last 1 year - which will explain this no movement in July but in August?
Jun 06 : 01JAN03 | July 06 : 01JAN03 | August 06 : U ---> No change in July. Aug backward
Jun 07 : 01APR04 | July 07 : C | August 07 : U ---> July Fiasco
Jun 08 : 01APR04 | July 08 : 01APR04 | August 08 : 01JUN06 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 09 : 01JAN00 | July 09 : 01JAN00 | August 09 : 01OCT03 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 10 : 01FEB05 | July 10 : ?????? | August 10 : ???? ---> Do your really expect forward movement in July?
Except July Fiasco , I don't see dates ever moving forward in July VB; but they do move in August VB.
Has anything changed in spillover laws in last 1 year - which will explain this no movement in July but in August?
Jun 06 : 01JAN03 | July 06 : 01JAN03 | August 06 : U ---> No change in July. Aug backward
Jun 07 : 01APR04 | July 07 : C | August 07 : U ---> July Fiasco
Jun 08 : 01APR04 | July 08 : 01APR04 | August 08 : 01JUN06 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 09 : 01JAN00 | July 09 : 01JAN00 | August 09 : 01OCT03 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 10 : 01FEB05 | July 10 : ?????? | August 10 : ???? ---> Do your really expect forward movement in July?
more...
Libra
10-03 03:08 PM
cchaitu,
no you dont see anything abt FP on 485 status. If you haven't called USCIS, you can call once and see, it may help.
no you dont see anything abt FP on 485 status. If you haven't called USCIS, you can call once and see, it may help.
2010 Christina Aguilera Leaked
add78
05-23 08:49 AM
Please do not mix social issues with immigration, this is not a forum about one particular country or its social manifestations (like how do I marry?, should I stay single forever? How am I going to find a girl?). These questions are absurd from American / immigration standpoint. If you already have a spouse and have immigration issues related to those situations then yes that is valid to ask here but otherwise (But how do I get the spouse then???) is purely a social / cultural issue. Please stick to immigration issues.
Thank you.
Thank you.
more...
diptam
06-10 07:29 PM
My point is not TSC or NSC - my point is we all sufferers should now unite and create pressure. I cant do alone , you cant do alone.
How do you want to contact AILA - why they should suddenly listen to a bunch of 10 stray immigrants like you , me ??
One thing i dont follow in your post how EB3 becoming U affect Processing times of I-140 ? I-140 doesn't depend on "Country of Origin" or "Retrogression".
Let me know !
There's a EB3 140 approval drought in not just NSC, but TSC too. I think it's going to get worse with EB3 becoming U. I am myself EB3 Mar 2005 and my job isn't looking very stable after my company resorted to outsourcing.
Can we suggest to AILA reinstatement of premium processing for those who've waited beyond some acceptable period of time? The same way they are doing for people whose H1's are at the brink of expiration.
I don't see any other way they will ever give heed to this problem i.e. where no monetary gains are involved.
How do you want to contact AILA - why they should suddenly listen to a bunch of 10 stray immigrants like you , me ??
One thing i dont follow in your post how EB3 becoming U affect Processing times of I-140 ? I-140 doesn't depend on "Country of Origin" or "Retrogression".
Let me know !
There's a EB3 140 approval drought in not just NSC, but TSC too. I think it's going to get worse with EB3 becoming U. I am myself EB3 Mar 2005 and my job isn't looking very stable after my company resorted to outsourcing.
Can we suggest to AILA reinstatement of premium processing for those who've waited beyond some acceptable period of time? The same way they are doing for people whose H1's are at the brink of expiration.
I don't see any other way they will ever give heed to this problem i.e. where no monetary gains are involved.
hair Christina Aguilera#39;s Intimate
somegchuh
02-08 02:56 PM
I think you make some very good point about funding. I see some people complaining how a lot of members aren't contributing. I think it is plain naive to expect everyone to contribute.
People can be divided into three types:
1. People willing to fight what they percieve as injustice.
2. People who complain but do nothing about what they think is unjust.
3. People who accept injustice as part of life.
This isn't just about immigration. It could be any issue. Most ppl want someone else to do what's needed. They don't want to spend time or money. There will always be a few ppl who are active. If you belong to category 1, don't expect everyone to belong there.
The other aspect IV should consider is broadening the goals. IV has done good work but the core focus seems to be retrogression. Tens of thousands of ppl have cases rotting in BEC for 3-5 years they are not going to contribute to an organization that will put them at par with ppl who filed for labor in the last couple of years. It goes against human psychology.
Just my 2 cents....
--for you only.please read below the reply posted by fellow member franklin--
First off - I have contributed, but here is an explanation of my initial reluctance to do so and possibly why I haven't contributed more than I have, since you asked.
I have often been offended by the tone and bias on this board, when it is plainly evident that the majority of power posters think their own situation as being the only thing that should be resolved, alienating others as a result.
Don't tell me to donate by spending less money on stuff that culturally I never do, or refer to people that I know little about - all for cultural reasons. It was this thread that spurred me to contribute, and ironically, this thread that also offended me first. I still haven't forgotten that.
Wonder how else you alienate people? Try posting in a language that isn't English.
Regarding the recent pledge drive in particular, it gives me a nasty taste in my mouth since it stings of hypocrisy that I can't get over. A similar one was attempted by a member here (which I signed up for), using the ""I will donate $10 monthly to Immigration Voice for one year but only if 1,000 other people will do the same."
That effort, although endorsed by the core group, got 88 people to vote, and was criticized in these very forums as being a waste of time, or not the proper way to do it. Of course, fast forward a few months and now look...
I also find it distasteful to have to read through threads that could be of some importance or value, but find that good chunks are just "Hey, look at me, look at how much I contributed"
So, since I'm all bitter and alienated , why did I actually contribute?
Every time I get annoyed or offended by someone's insensitive or cultural narrow mindedness, I try to ignore it and remind myself that that single person does not represent the values of the core group and this organization as a whole. It gets challenging.
Please don't flame me, I am trying to be honest
-----
People can be divided into three types:
1. People willing to fight what they percieve as injustice.
2. People who complain but do nothing about what they think is unjust.
3. People who accept injustice as part of life.
This isn't just about immigration. It could be any issue. Most ppl want someone else to do what's needed. They don't want to spend time or money. There will always be a few ppl who are active. If you belong to category 1, don't expect everyone to belong there.
The other aspect IV should consider is broadening the goals. IV has done good work but the core focus seems to be retrogression. Tens of thousands of ppl have cases rotting in BEC for 3-5 years they are not going to contribute to an organization that will put them at par with ppl who filed for labor in the last couple of years. It goes against human psychology.
Just my 2 cents....
--for you only.please read below the reply posted by fellow member franklin--
First off - I have contributed, but here is an explanation of my initial reluctance to do so and possibly why I haven't contributed more than I have, since you asked.
I have often been offended by the tone and bias on this board, when it is plainly evident that the majority of power posters think their own situation as being the only thing that should be resolved, alienating others as a result.
Don't tell me to donate by spending less money on stuff that culturally I never do, or refer to people that I know little about - all for cultural reasons. It was this thread that spurred me to contribute, and ironically, this thread that also offended me first. I still haven't forgotten that.
Wonder how else you alienate people? Try posting in a language that isn't English.
Regarding the recent pledge drive in particular, it gives me a nasty taste in my mouth since it stings of hypocrisy that I can't get over. A similar one was attempted by a member here (which I signed up for), using the ""I will donate $10 monthly to Immigration Voice for one year but only if 1,000 other people will do the same."
That effort, although endorsed by the core group, got 88 people to vote, and was criticized in these very forums as being a waste of time, or not the proper way to do it. Of course, fast forward a few months and now look...
I also find it distasteful to have to read through threads that could be of some importance or value, but find that good chunks are just "Hey, look at me, look at how much I contributed"
So, since I'm all bitter and alienated , why did I actually contribute?
Every time I get annoyed or offended by someone's insensitive or cultural narrow mindedness, I try to ignore it and remind myself that that single person does not represent the values of the core group and this organization as a whole. It gets challenging.
Please don't flame me, I am trying to be honest
-----
more...
nk2006
10-07 02:51 PM
Hi Friends,
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
Can undrstand your anxiety and hope things will workout for you.
But your details are sketchy...what do you mean by all the projects from your current company are being moved to another company: is the new company Y is buying your current company X. Then you might be OK. I remember reading somewhere that - in case of a merger your application for I140/I485 will not be disturbed if the new company takes over all the assets/debts of the old company. Search in these forums on company merger (more on other popular forums) and you will get more info. Understand the agreement between the two companies (your current X and new Y) - if its a straight forward acquisition (taking over assets and also debts and all previous agreed upon contacts) then you will be fine - I know because I have been thru an acquision during a pending I140.
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
Can undrstand your anxiety and hope things will workout for you.
But your details are sketchy...what do you mean by all the projects from your current company are being moved to another company: is the new company Y is buying your current company X. Then you might be OK. I remember reading somewhere that - in case of a merger your application for I140/I485 will not be disturbed if the new company takes over all the assets/debts of the old company. Search in these forums on company merger (more on other popular forums) and you will get more info. Understand the agreement between the two companies (your current X and new Y) - if its a straight forward acquisition (taking over assets and also debts and all previous agreed upon contacts) then you will be fine - I know because I have been thru an acquision during a pending I140.
hot Christina Aguilera has new
mzdial
June 4th, 2004, 01:53 PM
I don't own a D70 or know of anyone, but sometimes I just wonder if it's the hands in control of the device that have a lack of experience and blame it on the equipment.
Rest assured that if that's the camera of your choosing, buy it and I'm sure that you will be fine most likely. There are plenty of happy D70 owners that you're NOT hearing from, they are out taking photos!
The Canon 10D was plagued by forum reports of backfocusing, and perhaps there were a few/some that exhibited this behavior. But the majority do not and with everything, there may be a few bad apples in the bunch.
Buy your gear and don't worry so much about the forum problems you read about. You have a warranty if something just happens to be not right.
-- Matt
Rest assured that if that's the camera of your choosing, buy it and I'm sure that you will be fine most likely. There are plenty of happy D70 owners that you're NOT hearing from, they are out taking photos!
The Canon 10D was plagued by forum reports of backfocusing, and perhaps there were a few/some that exhibited this behavior. But the majority do not and with everything, there may be a few bad apples in the bunch.
Buy your gear and don't worry so much about the forum problems you read about. You have a warranty if something just happens to be not right.
-- Matt
more...
house Christina Aguilera leaked
lazycis
12-18 12:45 PM
What if the job i'm moving to after 180 days is hiring me permanently now itself? Do they still have to specify (in EVL for AC21) that they will hire me perm only upon getting GC?
Just specify that they intend to employ you on a permanent basis. It does not really matter whether it happens before or after you get your GC.
Just specify that they intend to employ you on a permanent basis. It does not really matter whether it happens before or after you get your GC.
tattoo Yes, Christina Aguilera#39;s
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-12 02:57 PM
Will it come today?
Tommorow or Thursday
Tommorow or Thursday
more...
pictures T.I Ft Christina Aguilera
pmat
01-25 12:44 PM
I can create a spreadsheet on thinkfree.com or any other collaboration site with information about monthly or recurring contributions
All those who have contributed please send me the details via private message so that this thread does not get swamped - I will work on it next weekend.
Thanks ramaonline for your help. Instead of relying on PMs lets open a new thread... The PM folder may overflow -- I think opening a new thread and asking contributing members to respond will be a better idea. Should I open the thread?
All those who have contributed please send me the details via private message so that this thread does not get swamped - I will work on it next weekend.
Thanks ramaonline for your help. Instead of relying on PMs lets open a new thread... The PM folder may overflow -- I think opening a new thread and asking contributing members to respond will be a better idea. Should I open the thread?
dresses Christina Aguilera#39;s racy
Sheetal_MA
10-14 07:21 PM
500,000 Legal immigrants in limbo:
lets say (I mean lets Tell them) 1/5 th of that # buy on an average $300K houses.
That equates to $30 billion.. Not a bad #. But I am sure all want to buy houses eventually. Thats $150 billion. Not a small #.
Lets say (again tell them).
1/100 th of 500,000 start companies, of 5 employees each=25,000 jobs.. Not bad again.
This idea is inline with our IV campaign that was discussed sometime back. We can tell in different forms to the media. Somebody may publish.
This is an interesting thought at first. However, I don't think it will hold water, especially in this environment. On the first item, assuming 1/5 will buy houses is a very optimistic number particularly given that many of those who can buy have already likely purchased a house. There is no legal hindrance in buying a house on a non-immigrant visa, hence it's a weak argument. Furthermore, it's a small number compared to the housing inventory.
Unfortunately, this is not a good time to push for immigration reform. The main counter-argument you will get right now is the need to preserve American jobs.
lets say (I mean lets Tell them) 1/5 th of that # buy on an average $300K houses.
That equates to $30 billion.. Not a bad #. But I am sure all want to buy houses eventually. Thats $150 billion. Not a small #.
Lets say (again tell them).
1/100 th of 500,000 start companies, of 5 employees each=25,000 jobs.. Not bad again.
This idea is inline with our IV campaign that was discussed sometime back. We can tell in different forms to the media. Somebody may publish.
This is an interesting thought at first. However, I don't think it will hold water, especially in this environment. On the first item, assuming 1/5 will buy houses is a very optimistic number particularly given that many of those who can buy have already likely purchased a house. There is no legal hindrance in buying a house on a non-immigrant visa, hence it's a weak argument. Furthermore, it's a small number compared to the housing inventory.
Unfortunately, this is not a good time to push for immigration reform. The main counter-argument you will get right now is the need to preserve American jobs.
more...
makeup Christina Aguilera
iptel
06-23 09:45 AM
;) Remember-its our money- the US govt. cannot deny it if asked by The Indian govt. IF they wanna keep it, better give us our GCs!
What do you think US is Indian colony like India use to be a British Colony before 1947.
However for sure there is no harm in discussing Soc Sec.
What do you think US is Indian colony like India use to be a British Colony before 1947.
However for sure there is no harm in discussing Soc Sec.
girlfriend Photo: Christina Aguilera via
GCKarma
06-14 06:33 PM
Gurus,
I�m bachelor. I�m planning to get married in another 6 months. Should I apply for I-485? If I should, can I add my spouse later to the I-485 application before I-485 is approved and priority date is not current. :confused:
I�m bachelor. I�m planning to get married in another 6 months. Should I apply for I-485? If I should, can I add my spouse later to the I-485 application before I-485 is approved and priority date is not current. :confused:
hairstyles Christina Aguilera strikes a
kumhyd2
07-18 02:31 PM
Lets figure out the next course of Action for IV in the best interests of its members. Let's itemize each one of them and propose possible solutions. This thread is not for question / answers about individual situations but broad GC issues to be resolved by Govt/Congress/USCIS/DHS/DOL by way of proposing bills/acts/resolutions/amendments. IV must have done this but I didn't see an easy way of getting it.
First we could categorize them into different buckets such as that IV did for the forums. Just made up some to give an example. Some gurus on IV can suggest a better categorizing
Ex:
1) Labor
a) Allow one to get promoted instead fixing to of a fixed job position in the labor advt.
2) I-140
a) Allow One to file for two I-140's
b) Have freedom to change employer when I-140 is pending
3) I-485
a) Allow one to get married while I-485 is pending or after approval or provide some status to the spouse for whose I-485 is approved
b) Have the flexibility of filing multiple 485's so that one can choose the best one at end of the approval stage
4) Finger Printing
a) ...
b) ...
5) Backlog
a) Resolve backlogs from 1999.. so and so..
OR in the following format
1) Labor
a) Issue : One cannot change job position while a labor is approved
Soln: Allow one to get promoted instead fixing to a fixed job position in the labor advt. Say so and so provision/act/amendment (Sect 2.3.1 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
2) I-140
a) Issue: More RFE's for I-140 change in job profiles
Soln: As the time passes and technologies changes the job profiles may change and it is not wise to look for word to word match in the job descriptions. Say so and so provision/act/amendment (Sect 5.3.2 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
b) Have freedom to change employer when I-140 is pending
Soln: The time taking for getting the PD is too long and so EAD has to be issued at the I-140 stage itself. Provision/act/amendment (Sect 2.3.4 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
3) I-485
a) Issue: One cannot get married and bring the spouse while I-485 is pending
Soln : As most of the GC aspirants are in their marriage age and this hampers prospect of getting married when I-485 is pending. Allow one to get married while I-485 is pending or after approval or provide some status to the spouse for whose I-485 is approved. Section 6..7..8 blah blah has to be modified to accomodate this
b) Have the flexibility of filing multiple 485's so that one can choose the best one at end of the approval stage
Soln: Give the freedom for some one to file multiple 485's but allow to choose one. Modify section 554.34.3.34 blah
4) Finger Printing
a) blah blah..
b) blah blah
5) Backlog
a) Resolve backlogs from 1999.. so and so..
I just cooked up some above but the actual one's may be different
I am sure the IV Core must have these itemized already. Some one in the core team may take a lead on this and formalize the process. This is what probably the way we try resolving problems rather than balabbering issues among ourselves in the postings amongst us.
There are lot many individual stories on different threads, and there is some thing common out of all these postings and that common issue should be the action item to be taken up by IV.
Guys put in your thoughts and come up with better approach or improve up one of the above approaches. But do something before every looses the tempo.
If this can be made as a sticky and the first post can be updated with each new issue that itself takes us what we need to do and how we are trying to tackle and what are the time lines.
Hope this helps
First we could categorize them into different buckets such as that IV did for the forums. Just made up some to give an example. Some gurus on IV can suggest a better categorizing
Ex:
1) Labor
a) Allow one to get promoted instead fixing to of a fixed job position in the labor advt.
2) I-140
a) Allow One to file for two I-140's
b) Have freedom to change employer when I-140 is pending
3) I-485
a) Allow one to get married while I-485 is pending or after approval or provide some status to the spouse for whose I-485 is approved
b) Have the flexibility of filing multiple 485's so that one can choose the best one at end of the approval stage
4) Finger Printing
a) ...
b) ...
5) Backlog
a) Resolve backlogs from 1999.. so and so..
OR in the following format
1) Labor
a) Issue : One cannot change job position while a labor is approved
Soln: Allow one to get promoted instead fixing to a fixed job position in the labor advt. Say so and so provision/act/amendment (Sect 2.3.1 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
2) I-140
a) Issue: More RFE's for I-140 change in job profiles
Soln: As the time passes and technologies changes the job profiles may change and it is not wise to look for word to word match in the job descriptions. Say so and so provision/act/amendment (Sect 5.3.2 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
b) Have freedom to change employer when I-140 is pending
Soln: The time taking for getting the PD is too long and so EAD has to be issued at the I-140 stage itself. Provision/act/amendment (Sect 2.3.4 blah blah has to be changed to resolve this issue.
3) I-485
a) Issue: One cannot get married and bring the spouse while I-485 is pending
Soln : As most of the GC aspirants are in their marriage age and this hampers prospect of getting married when I-485 is pending. Allow one to get married while I-485 is pending or after approval or provide some status to the spouse for whose I-485 is approved. Section 6..7..8 blah blah has to be modified to accomodate this
b) Have the flexibility of filing multiple 485's so that one can choose the best one at end of the approval stage
Soln: Give the freedom for some one to file multiple 485's but allow to choose one. Modify section 554.34.3.34 blah
4) Finger Printing
a) blah blah..
b) blah blah
5) Backlog
a) Resolve backlogs from 1999.. so and so..
I just cooked up some above but the actual one's may be different
I am sure the IV Core must have these itemized already. Some one in the core team may take a lead on this and formalize the process. This is what probably the way we try resolving problems rather than balabbering issues among ourselves in the postings amongst us.
There are lot many individual stories on different threads, and there is some thing common out of all these postings and that common issue should be the action item to be taken up by IV.
Guys put in your thoughts and come up with better approach or improve up one of the above approaches. But do something before every looses the tempo.
If this can be made as a sticky and the first post can be updated with each new issue that itself takes us what we need to do and how we are trying to tackle and what are the time lines.
Hope this helps
kaisersose
04-18 11:35 AM
An interview does not mean approval. This is just part of CIS pre-processing cases when the PD is not current. They will interview the applicant, process it and then throw it into storage.
About 5% of cases are randomly selected for interviews. This does not mean that they are out to approve a 2007 case ahead of a 2001 case.
About 5% of cases are randomly selected for interviews. This does not mean that they are out to approve a 2007 case ahead of a 2001 case.
win_or_win
03-30 10:45 AM
If you are working on H1, #2 is not an option. You will be violating immigration laws by accepting payment from unauthorized sources by doing so.
Thanks guys for your reply. This was tremendous knowledge that you guys dumped in.
Let's say if I am on the green card (EAD) , then still I can not evade this tax situation correct ?I mean if they pay me and I pay to the company in India who is really responsible for the service.
Thanks guys for your reply. This was tremendous knowledge that you guys dumped in.
Let's say if I am on the green card (EAD) , then still I can not evade this tax situation correct ?I mean if they pay me and I pay to the company in India who is really responsible for the service.