tv25
09-17 01:49 AM
TV25, Ron Gotcher is a good attorney and this is his web site http://www.imminfo.com/...I don't know him personally but, he is an American and he replies to most of the queries in his forum, and with very good explanation. Ask him...that's my suggestion...
LostInGCProcess,
Thanks much for the information, I have posted a message there, hope he will provide some guidance to relieve me from this stress and pain :(
LostInGCProcess,
Thanks much for the information, I have posted a message there, hope he will provide some guidance to relieve me from this stress and pain :(
wallpaper Download medium wallpaper of
JunRN
09-18 04:21 PM
C09 means you're are applying for EAD based on pending I-485 application.
Regarding Section and PD, I am not sure of the impact of that. Let's wait for others who have knowledge about that to answer. What I believe is that these two fields are not that important in EAD processing. EAD is processed according to EAD Receipt Date, not PD.
Regarding Section and PD, I am not sure of the impact of that. Let's wait for others who have knowledge about that to answer. What I believe is that these two fields are not that important in EAD processing. EAD is processed according to EAD Receipt Date, not PD.
optimist
06-22 01:34 PM
...The idea is to have atleast a few solid evidences and then add in the rest but dont clutter the whole thing in a way that they miss the most important ones...
I agree with what thomachan72 says. You are better off sending only the necessary documents to keep your case crisp, instead of confusing the adjudicator with reams of paperwork. I don't think you need to write a letter explaining non-availability of experience letter. I certainly DO NOT recommend bringing up the bond and other disputes with your previous employer.
Like you discovered yourself, your case got an RFE because of the missing document. With all the affidavits, paystubs and offer letter you have a clean case. Don't mess it up by giving too many unncessary documents.
Good luck to you, my friend.
I agree with what thomachan72 says. You are better off sending only the necessary documents to keep your case crisp, instead of confusing the adjudicator with reams of paperwork. I don't think you need to write a letter explaining non-availability of experience letter. I certainly DO NOT recommend bringing up the bond and other disputes with your previous employer.
Like you discovered yourself, your case got an RFE because of the missing document. With all the affidavits, paystubs and offer letter you have a clean case. Don't mess it up by giving too many unncessary documents.
Good luck to you, my friend.
2011 Lonely Cat Starring at Night
EndRetro
02-26 05:03 PM
EndRetro,
If anyone from this group is visiting India in the near future, it might be helpful if you can arrange an audience with Ravi.....and make him aware of the concerns/issues..
What does the IV admin group have to say about this!?
Sure, Let me know if anyone would be going...I will try my level best.
If anyone from this group is visiting India in the near future, it might be helpful if you can arrange an audience with Ravi.....and make him aware of the concerns/issues..
What does the IV admin group have to say about this!?
Sure, Let me know if anyone would be going...I will try my level best.
more...
singhsa3
04-27 08:19 AM
Warning: You must not solely rely on the information provided in the links in this thread. Some of the information may be outdated or are just people's opinion.
In this thread, I will be providing resources from the Internet on EAD issues, especifically as they relate to E-filling. Please feel free to enrich this thread by providing your own links. If you see any information that is no longer pertinent or inaccurate , please point that out immediately.
I will be specifically targeting the following frequently asked questions:
a) Where to file if your I-485 is pending in say, NSC , where as your I-765 center is TSC?
b) How come , if you paper file, you won't get biometrics but if you file you get biometric appointment?
c) What supporting documents to send? The instructions are not clear..
d) Do I need to stop working if my EAD is not renewed in time?
e) What is the interim policy on EAD issuance , if I don't get it in time?
f) If I am filling by myself this time , do I have to amend G-28 form?
g) My passport is expiring, will this create a problem in the EAD renewal?
h) How soon I can apply? How late is not too late?
I will add more questions as they come up. Again, please feel free to suggest questions and provide links that would address the above questions.
In this thread, I will be providing resources from the Internet on EAD issues, especifically as they relate to E-filling. Please feel free to enrich this thread by providing your own links. If you see any information that is no longer pertinent or inaccurate , please point that out immediately.
I will be specifically targeting the following frequently asked questions:
a) Where to file if your I-485 is pending in say, NSC , where as your I-765 center is TSC?
b) How come , if you paper file, you won't get biometrics but if you file you get biometric appointment?
c) What supporting documents to send? The instructions are not clear..
d) Do I need to stop working if my EAD is not renewed in time?
e) What is the interim policy on EAD issuance , if I don't get it in time?
f) If I am filling by myself this time , do I have to amend G-28 form?
g) My passport is expiring, will this create a problem in the EAD renewal?
h) How soon I can apply? How late is not too late?
I will add more questions as they come up. Again, please feel free to suggest questions and provide links that would address the above questions.
austingc
07-08 05:25 PM
[QUOTE=austingc;1967464][[I]QUOTE=sammas;1967354]Probably the RFE might be related to photos not being sent. A friend of mine received a RFE for not sending the photos eventhough they are not required to be sent but he did not get any Biometrics notice.
Austingc,
What do you mean by lost in the email? What are you referring to here? I am sorry, I did not get what you are trying to mention here.
The RFE was to send the photographs. Online status also was changed to Request For Evidence and then once the photos were sent the status was changed back to resumed processing and after that the status was changed to Approved. Hope it is clear now.
Didn't you mention your friend did not receive biometrics notice? What I meant was he might not have received the biometrics notice to appear for finger print and photos. Thatswhy I said may be lost in the mail, since he did not appear for biometrics, USCIS issued an RFE to send photographs. Are you clear now?
Austingc,
What do you mean by lost in the email? What are you referring to here? I am sorry, I did not get what you are trying to mention here.
The RFE was to send the photographs. Online status also was changed to Request For Evidence and then once the photos were sent the status was changed back to resumed processing and after that the status was changed to Approved. Hope it is clear now.
Didn't you mention your friend did not receive biometrics notice? What I meant was he might not have received the biometrics notice to appear for finger print and photos. Thatswhy I said may be lost in the mail, since he did not appear for biometrics, USCIS issued an RFE to send photographs. Are you clear now?
more...
amitjoey
05-21 06:50 PM
Was ur denail on A2p ?or education related n do we get a new receipt number after filing MTR?
A2P...YES!! you will get a receipt. MTR is I290B
A2P...YES!! you will get a receipt. MTR is I290B
2010 Face Lonely Wallpapers and
apatel_17
07-11 04:19 PM
whats going on today....all the law skirters are back...one is this thread the other is the labor substitution thread with 3 yr bachelor degrees....why dont u guys go back to immigration portal and get UN to help u with ur skirting the law issues
Please be careful before making allegations. There is nothing morally or legally wrong about planning your taxes. Do you claim your spouse or kids as your dependents in your taxes? Why is it wrong to get an exemption for your parents whom you support with your earnings?
Please be careful before making allegations. There is nothing morally or legally wrong about planning your taxes. Do you claim your spouse or kids as your dependents in your taxes? Why is it wrong to get an exemption for your parents whom you support with your earnings?
more...
yabadaba
06-22 03:36 PM
hes coming for his annual shopping holiday...dont think they really care about us
hair Bue Lonely Wallpaper by
snathan
08-04 12:40 PM
Thanks Snathan. But do you think I may get my 140 cleared on the basis of 3 year degree?
Thats what I have said in my previous post...Its tough. But it depend on the job requirement and the PERM wording...and your luck
Thats what I have said in my previous post...Its tough. But it depend on the job requirement and the PERM wording...and your luck
more...
kumar1
07-11 03:13 PM
Boss-------Salaam Hai Tumhey ----Maar lo IRS ki!!!
hot This wallpaper is also
Jitamitra
07-19 05:33 PM
I totally agree. We need to push for a USCIS SOP change where you should be able to add your spouse even when you PD is not current. Like in my situation, my wife is outside US and unfortunately cannot come back till Sep 21 (F1 --> H1 Stamping) issue.
Earlier, we never had this issue because PD was predictable and only allowed folks who were very close to their PD's. Now with this fiasco, no one is sure how uscis would process the order of applications and there is a greater risk that your application might be approved before your PD on the basis of RD (Receipt Date)
IV Core!! Need your leadership to help folks like us.
Earlier, we never had this issue because PD was predictable and only allowed folks who were very close to their PD's. Now with this fiasco, no one is sure how uscis would process the order of applications and there is a greater risk that your application might be approved before your PD on the basis of RD (Receipt Date)
IV Core!! Need your leadership to help folks like us.
more...
house The Sasuke Stadium -- You Want
Nil
05-13 08:01 PM
Hello cool_desi_gc,
I downloaded the access database but could not find employee name in there. Is there any other way to get the labor record? Also I don't have the labor case number to match to this record.
This is for PERM data only.
Can you pls say how to find out for non perm cases?
I downloaded the access database but could not find employee name in there. Is there any other way to get the labor record? Also I don't have the labor case number to match to this record.
This is for PERM data only.
Can you pls say how to find out for non perm cases?
tattoo Lonely Island Wallpaper
nk2006
10-07 02:51 PM
Hi Friends,
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
Can undrstand your anxiety and hope things will workout for you.
But your details are sketchy...what do you mean by all the projects from your current company are being moved to another company: is the new company Y is buying your current company X. Then you might be OK. I remember reading somewhere that - in case of a merger your application for I140/I485 will not be disturbed if the new company takes over all the assets/debts of the old company. Search in these forums on company merger (more on other popular forums) and you will get more info. Understand the agreement between the two companies (your current X and new Y) - if its a straight forward acquisition (taking over assets and also debts and all previous agreed upon contacts) then you will be fine - I know because I have been thru an acquision during a pending I140.
I am a permanent employee for "x" company, my 140 filed on May 1,2007 waiting for approval, 485 filed on August 22,2007 not been approved either, we just got our EAD's, also please note that i am on 6th year extension on h1... my company "x" moving all projects to the different company "y" from December 1, 2007. ie we are all moving to "y" with the same job title just everything is same istead of "x" it is now "y" company.
When i called my legal department and ask them about green card status they simply said nothing to worry... everything will be moved to "y" company, as a transition exployees..
Be honest with you guys...from the last 4 days... i could not sleep... i really dont know what to do in this situation, this is the reason.. i am seeking your help. can some one guide me or answer below questions please.
1. 140 filed 05/01/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 180 days with "X" company
2. 485 filed 08/22/2007 - 11/30/2007 more than 90 days with "x" company
3. EAD approved
4. Travel documents approved
5. I am on H1 6th year extension.
6. Transition employee.
my question is
1 Can my green card status remains the same and continue the process with the new "y" company ?
2.Do "y" company has to start processing labour/140 again ??
3.Is it doable that moving everything from "x" to "y" including GC processings ??
Thanks in advance...Kindly help me out in this situation like how to proceed from here
With sincere regards...
Desy
Can undrstand your anxiety and hope things will workout for you.
But your details are sketchy...what do you mean by all the projects from your current company are being moved to another company: is the new company Y is buying your current company X. Then you might be OK. I remember reading somewhere that - in case of a merger your application for I140/I485 will not be disturbed if the new company takes over all the assets/debts of the old company. Search in these forums on company merger (more on other popular forums) and you will get more info. Understand the agreement between the two companies (your current X and new Y) - if its a straight forward acquisition (taking over assets and also debts and all previous agreed upon contacts) then you will be fine - I know because I have been thru an acquision during a pending I140.
more...
pictures Lonely Flower K-On! Wallpaper
rk07
09-27 02:19 PM
All,
Anyone applied on July 23rd at NSC and not received the RN?
Anyone in the same boat with me?
Thanks,
-rk.
Anyone applied on July 23rd at NSC and not received the RN?
Anyone in the same boat with me?
Thanks,
-rk.
dresses sad lonely pain Wallpaper,
ivuser
02-16 04:50 PM
Immigration Portal
Page URL : http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=176490
To access, got to immigrationportal.com then access the following threads.
ImmigrationPortal Forums > After The Green Card And US Citizenship > Life After The Green Card ->
Leaving Employer Soon After Gc....
Important note:
The thread has lot of individual’s opinion. Any opinion form source other than Lawyers, has chance of error and some of them are misleading. The thread has to be studied carefully.
There are other threads related to the same topic in the section "Life After The Green Card"
Page URL : http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=176490
To access, got to immigrationportal.com then access the following threads.
ImmigrationPortal Forums > After The Green Card And US Citizenship > Life After The Green Card ->
Leaving Employer Soon After Gc....
Important note:
The thread has lot of individual’s opinion. Any opinion form source other than Lawyers, has chance of error and some of them are misleading. The thread has to be studied carefully.
There are other threads related to the same topic in the section "Life After The Green Card"
more...
makeup medium wallpaper of lonely
need_EAD
05-24 12:40 PM
done
girlfriend Love Lonely Wallpaper
ganguteli
06-25 12:55 PM
I have added the poll.
Ganguteli - I told you what I think, its your choice now.
I am also asking people to think so that they are not taken advantage of.
Ganguteli - I told you what I think, its your choice now.
I am also asking people to think so that they are not taken advantage of.
hairstyles lonely king wallpaper
jambapamba
07-18 01:07 AM
Is it possible to file I-485 without I-693(Medical) ?
The reason I ask is that I cannot get a doctor's appointment in July. For some reason, if we are able to file in July, can I submit the 485 first and submit teh I-693 later.
Please advise
NO WAY.
The reason I ask is that I cannot get a doctor's appointment in July. For some reason, if we are able to file in July, can I submit the 485 first and submit teh I-693 later.
Please advise
NO WAY.
talash
04-25 04:02 PM
I have an option of having 2 employers at same time .because i work only 2 weeks in a month .i can have an other employer for other 2 weeks in a month .Even if i work 12 days each for both employes they are OK .and both are willing to help me .I just need advise for best option .attorny probbaly wats to file MTR after receiving notice .
sobers
02-28 02:41 PM
Awesome work, guys!
Btw, besides roll call, another influential Capitol Hill publication is "The Hill".
This story ran in it today. If anything, this (the portion in bold) demonstrates the power of your faxes/emails to lawmakers.
--------
THE HILL
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Business/022806_immigration.html
Anti-immigration groups up against unusual coalition
By Patrick O’Connor
The National Restaurant Association usually does not join forces with the National Council of La Raza, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce rarely, if ever, aligns itself with the Conference of Catholic Bishops.
But those organizations and many others have come together in support of a comprehensive immigration-reform bill that would expand guest-worker programs and offer undocumented workers already in this country a path to citizenship. They are up against an aggressive cross-section of single-issue organizations that favor increased enforcement of immigration laws and have condemned any legislation that would allow undocumented workers already here eventually to become citizens.
With the Senate Judiciary Committee expected to mark up its version of the immigration bill Thursday, groups on either side of the issue have geared up for a hard fight, and the vehemence and intractability of either side should make compromise particularly difficult for lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Staff members of many of the organizations involved in this fight stayed up much of last Thursday night poring over details of draft legislation released by Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) in anticipation of this week’s markup. By Friday afternoon, many of those organizations released statements either heralding or deriding Specter’s draft.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) has said he would like to move a bill to the floor by the end of March, meaning next month is critical in the years-long debate over immigration reform.
A unique coalition of divergent interest groups have rallied in support of a bill introduced by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), with select members of the AFL-CIO teaming up with social-welfare organizations, the Chamber and other business groups that support a temporary-worker program.
“The fact that the Chamber of Commerce needs comprehensive immigration reform is very good,” said Flavia Jimenez, an outreach director for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy organization.
Members of the business community also appreciate working with groups such as La Raza because it allows the overarching coalition to communicate with Republicans and Democrats alike on Capitol Hill.
“It’s nice actually to get to work with these guys,” said John Gay, a senior vice president for government affairs with the National Restaurant Association, which co-chairs the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC), a group of more than 40 business and trade associations seeking comprehensive reform.
Because the many groups within this broad coalition have slightly different priorities, they must communicate regularly to push common themes. In the end, these organizations are all fighting for what they consider the best interests of their dues-paying members.
“When push comes to shove, we will all become … forceful advocates for our members,” Gay said. “If we’re at an impasse on something, it’s not through misunderstanding. When we differ, it will be for real reasons.”
Despite the breadth of interest groups advocating an expanded guest-worker program, the enforcement-only crowd makes considerably more noise on Capitol Hill, if the flood of mail, e-mail and phone calls to member offices is any indication.
A handful of single-issue groups opposing the guest-worker program have effectively put the other side on the defensive since President Bush first announced his intentions to push comprehensive immigration reform, as evidenced by the administration’s backtracking since Bush first proposed such a program in January 2004.
One of those groups, Numbers USA, has 135,000 registered activists throughout the country and an e-mail list in excess of 1 million subscribers, all of whom have signed up voluntarily, said Caroline Espinosa, a spokeswoman for the group. A link on the Numbers USA website also allows browsers to fax a personal note to members of Congress in support of increased enforcement of illegal immigration.
Numbers USA also does objective and subjective summaries of each bill introduced on the issue and notifies subscribers in advance of any important actions on Capitol Hill, such as this week’s markup. As such, the group was expected to send an alert asking those supporters living in states represented by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to call or fax their members in anticipation of that markup.
Unlike their counterparts on the guest-worker side of the debate, these single-issue groups do not coordinate to the extent of their rivals.
“We’re pretty separate,” Espinosa said. “We don’t even share resources, even though we’re all working toward the same goals.”
Battling with groups like Numbers USA is an uncommon experience for many members of the business community because they do not regularly work on such socially sensitive topics.
“We don’t usually end up on the other side of single-issue groups,” Gay said. “That’s unusual for us.”
McCain was scheduled to appear at a union hall in New York City yesterday with a number of these groups as a demonstration of how the expanded guest-worker program is attracting broad, bipartisan support.
The White House has sent signals to Republicans in both chambers that it favors comprehensive reform, which could include an expanded temporary-worker program. House leaders passed an enforcement-only bill under the assumption that the Senate would take up the more politically difficult guest-worker issue.
The anti-immigration crowd has political momentum at this stage in the fight, with congressional Republicans wary to cast any vote that could turn off their conservative base during this critical election year, but members will also have a hard time ignoring such a broad cross-section of business, labor and social groups with their own self-interested constituents.
“We’re not trying to damage America,” Gay said. “We’re just trying to keep our restaurants open.”
Btw, besides roll call, another influential Capitol Hill publication is "The Hill".
This story ran in it today. If anything, this (the portion in bold) demonstrates the power of your faxes/emails to lawmakers.
--------
THE HILL
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Business/022806_immigration.html
Anti-immigration groups up against unusual coalition
By Patrick O’Connor
The National Restaurant Association usually does not join forces with the National Council of La Raza, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce rarely, if ever, aligns itself with the Conference of Catholic Bishops.
But those organizations and many others have come together in support of a comprehensive immigration-reform bill that would expand guest-worker programs and offer undocumented workers already in this country a path to citizenship. They are up against an aggressive cross-section of single-issue organizations that favor increased enforcement of immigration laws and have condemned any legislation that would allow undocumented workers already here eventually to become citizens.
With the Senate Judiciary Committee expected to mark up its version of the immigration bill Thursday, groups on either side of the issue have geared up for a hard fight, and the vehemence and intractability of either side should make compromise particularly difficult for lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Staff members of many of the organizations involved in this fight stayed up much of last Thursday night poring over details of draft legislation released by Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) in anticipation of this week’s markup. By Friday afternoon, many of those organizations released statements either heralding or deriding Specter’s draft.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) has said he would like to move a bill to the floor by the end of March, meaning next month is critical in the years-long debate over immigration reform.
A unique coalition of divergent interest groups have rallied in support of a bill introduced by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), with select members of the AFL-CIO teaming up with social-welfare organizations, the Chamber and other business groups that support a temporary-worker program.
“The fact that the Chamber of Commerce needs comprehensive immigration reform is very good,” said Flavia Jimenez, an outreach director for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy organization.
Members of the business community also appreciate working with groups such as La Raza because it allows the overarching coalition to communicate with Republicans and Democrats alike on Capitol Hill.
“It’s nice actually to get to work with these guys,” said John Gay, a senior vice president for government affairs with the National Restaurant Association, which co-chairs the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC), a group of more than 40 business and trade associations seeking comprehensive reform.
Because the many groups within this broad coalition have slightly different priorities, they must communicate regularly to push common themes. In the end, these organizations are all fighting for what they consider the best interests of their dues-paying members.
“When push comes to shove, we will all become … forceful advocates for our members,” Gay said. “If we’re at an impasse on something, it’s not through misunderstanding. When we differ, it will be for real reasons.”
Despite the breadth of interest groups advocating an expanded guest-worker program, the enforcement-only crowd makes considerably more noise on Capitol Hill, if the flood of mail, e-mail and phone calls to member offices is any indication.
A handful of single-issue groups opposing the guest-worker program have effectively put the other side on the defensive since President Bush first announced his intentions to push comprehensive immigration reform, as evidenced by the administration’s backtracking since Bush first proposed such a program in January 2004.
One of those groups, Numbers USA, has 135,000 registered activists throughout the country and an e-mail list in excess of 1 million subscribers, all of whom have signed up voluntarily, said Caroline Espinosa, a spokeswoman for the group. A link on the Numbers USA website also allows browsers to fax a personal note to members of Congress in support of increased enforcement of illegal immigration.
Numbers USA also does objective and subjective summaries of each bill introduced on the issue and notifies subscribers in advance of any important actions on Capitol Hill, such as this week’s markup. As such, the group was expected to send an alert asking those supporters living in states represented by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to call or fax their members in anticipation of that markup.
Unlike their counterparts on the guest-worker side of the debate, these single-issue groups do not coordinate to the extent of their rivals.
“We’re pretty separate,” Espinosa said. “We don’t even share resources, even though we’re all working toward the same goals.”
Battling with groups like Numbers USA is an uncommon experience for many members of the business community because they do not regularly work on such socially sensitive topics.
“We don’t usually end up on the other side of single-issue groups,” Gay said. “That’s unusual for us.”
McCain was scheduled to appear at a union hall in New York City yesterday with a number of these groups as a demonstration of how the expanded guest-worker program is attracting broad, bipartisan support.
The White House has sent signals to Republicans in both chambers that it favors comprehensive reform, which could include an expanded temporary-worker program. House leaders passed an enforcement-only bill under the assumption that the Senate would take up the more politically difficult guest-worker issue.
The anti-immigration crowd has political momentum at this stage in the fight, with congressional Republicans wary to cast any vote that could turn off their conservative base during this critical election year, but members will also have a hard time ignoring such a broad cross-section of business, labor and social groups with their own self-interested constituents.
“We’re not trying to damage America,” Gay said. “We’re just trying to keep our restaurants open.”