lordoftherings
07-19 05:25 PM
When is the last case for EB2 India approved?Just wanted to know the priority date of it.Mine is June 2006 EB2 when can i get my GC?Any guess?
This is wrong thread to ask that question, but anyway estimates are that 2006 Eb2s should be approved by 2013 considering the number of visas remain at 140K each year. Someone in IV made all this analysis and put an excel spreadsheet, you can find it in one of the forums and check yourself.
This is wrong thread to ask that question, but anyway estimates are that 2006 Eb2s should be approved by 2013 considering the number of visas remain at 140K each year. Someone in IV made all this analysis and put an excel spreadsheet, you can find it in one of the forums and check yourself.
wallpaper and dating Zac Efron are
willigetgc?
02-25 01:19 PM
Maybe one more thing to say...
Ask the skeptics to contact StarSun. Let IV handle the convincing, if you and I can bring the people..........
Ask the skeptics to contact StarSun. Let IV handle the convincing, if you and I can bring the people..........
gccovet
09-19 10:53 AM
Can we utilize the US Citizen children to campaign for our cause. We can highlight our cause better that way. We shall certainly get more attention. We also must make sure to highlight that we are LEGAL immigrants.
I don't think this will fly, two reasons (but we can always try)- Not trying to discourage the thoughts/actions.
1. US Govt. revoked the policy to grant legal status to parents of US born children few years back(per NumberUSA they are called Anchor Baby-- go figure.. I hate this term very much).
2. I had read somewhere of similar case where a family tried to appeal for themselves in a court arguing that his US born child has all the rights to be raised in his country of birth and that he would need his parents to do so, hence the plea. They were told that they could take the child back to home country and US will be glad to welcome the baby when he/she turns 18.
GCCovet.
I don't think this will fly, two reasons (but we can always try)- Not trying to discourage the thoughts/actions.
1. US Govt. revoked the policy to grant legal status to parents of US born children few years back(per NumberUSA they are called Anchor Baby-- go figure.. I hate this term very much).
2. I had read somewhere of similar case where a family tried to appeal for themselves in a court arguing that his US born child has all the rights to be raised in his country of birth and that he would need his parents to do so, hence the plea. They were told that they could take the child back to home country and US will be glad to welcome the baby when he/she turns 18.
GCCovet.
2011 Is Vanessa Hudgens Upset Zac
abhijitp
11-20 04:33 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=194660#post194660
more...
stucklabor
04-14 10:55 AM
That is a good sentiment, Bkam.
Please don't mistake BerkeleyBee's post. From the point of view of the core team, many posters have ideas that seem correct to them and they post 'This is my idea, why can't we do this?'. In plain language, that translates to 'Why can't the core team do this?'.
So from my point of view - simply as someone who has been posting for a long time in Usenet, newsgroups etc - if you have a good idea, implement it yourself. E.g., if you want a webfax that thanks Senators, write the webfax and post it. Sample webfaxes are available on the website, customize it and post it. The "core team" is human. We are balancing full time jobs with the web site and it would help if people making suggestions also implemented it.
In this idea that has been posted re: educating people in other countries, that is NOT part of IV's mission. IV's mission is clear: it is social service to people that want to get a green card. It is also social service to educate prospective immigrants about the delays in the GC process. However, that is not part of IV's mission. It can be part of Bkam's and Learning01's personal missions, however.
I think the one additional thing is also that we need to using harsh terms to blame the U.S. system or Congress for our problems. Lots of people have problems, Congress has limited time to tackle everyone's problems. As someone prominent that we met said 'War on terror, injustice to immigrants.. You know what is going to win every time'. So let us keep perspective and soldier on, remember we are also getting prominent, so now is the time to present ourselves and the forum in the best light possible.
Please don't mistake BerkeleyBee's post. From the point of view of the core team, many posters have ideas that seem correct to them and they post 'This is my idea, why can't we do this?'. In plain language, that translates to 'Why can't the core team do this?'.
So from my point of view - simply as someone who has been posting for a long time in Usenet, newsgroups etc - if you have a good idea, implement it yourself. E.g., if you want a webfax that thanks Senators, write the webfax and post it. Sample webfaxes are available on the website, customize it and post it. The "core team" is human. We are balancing full time jobs with the web site and it would help if people making suggestions also implemented it.
In this idea that has been posted re: educating people in other countries, that is NOT part of IV's mission. IV's mission is clear: it is social service to people that want to get a green card. It is also social service to educate prospective immigrants about the delays in the GC process. However, that is not part of IV's mission. It can be part of Bkam's and Learning01's personal missions, however.
I think the one additional thing is also that we need to using harsh terms to blame the U.S. system or Congress for our problems. Lots of people have problems, Congress has limited time to tackle everyone's problems. As someone prominent that we met said 'War on terror, injustice to immigrants.. You know what is going to win every time'. So let us keep perspective and soldier on, remember we are also getting prominent, so now is the time to present ourselves and the forum in the best light possible.
JunRN
08-26 06:02 PM
Just thinking, is approval of EAD also meant that I-485 is accepted?
more...
kumhyd2
07-18 02:46 PM
If you are talking about the discussion. then am referring to the items and not the discussions.Have I missed these items some where that are like the above. Then we are good to go. Can you let me know if the action items already there tries to encompass all thes issues and possible solutions. Ofcourse I know every one is talking and discussing but didn't see a concrete list except a description on the front page saying we are fighting for the cause of GC aspirants and some smaller descriptions.
2010 Vanessa Hudgens Kissing
kirupa
04-01 11:30 PM
Btw, I'm detecting some odd voting patterns such as a few entries suddenly jumping up in rank from votes from members who registered recently and have similar/identical IPs.
This isn't taken lightly, and once the poll is wrapped up, the offending entries will have their votes subtracted.
This isn't taken lightly, and once the poll is wrapped up, the offending entries will have their votes subtracted.
more...
pappu
04-03 10:30 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24795
I am in serious trouble, please read and comment if you can help.
- Spouse (Primary) and I filed I 485 in June 2007. (PD March 2004)
- Spouse Application is approved in July 2008
- Spouse changes employers after approval
- In October 08 we write to the law firm that initially filed the I 485 to withdraw their representation.
- In Nov 08 the Law firm incorrectly writes to USCIS to with draw the I 485 application.
- In March 08 I get an email from USCIS stating my application is withdrawn.
I obtained the notice of withdrawal and the notice says
'As a result of your request, your application is considered withdrawn, and it will recieve no further consideration by USCIS. There is no appeal to this decision.'
Neither I nor my wife have authorized the attorney to withdraw the application, we only wanted them to withdraw their representation (I have the letter we wrote to them and it clearly states it.)
what can we do.
Is it possible to reinstate our case?
Can we refile my AOS again, even thought the primary applicants green card is approved more than 6 months ago?
Thanks for contacting IV with your SOS.
An IV core member is going to be helping you to fix this with USCIS. Let us know if you need help. He already tried contacting you yesterday.
As IV grows maybe this is a help IV can extend to all its donor members and help them if they get in such extreme distress situations. This is one of the ideas we are thinking for our members in the donor group.
Update: April 13,2009
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24824
The problem that IV member Drifter had with his I485 application has been fixed. IV had contacted USCIS and USCIS said that they will reinstate his case.
I am in serious trouble, please read and comment if you can help.
- Spouse (Primary) and I filed I 485 in June 2007. (PD March 2004)
- Spouse Application is approved in July 2008
- Spouse changes employers after approval
- In October 08 we write to the law firm that initially filed the I 485 to withdraw their representation.
- In Nov 08 the Law firm incorrectly writes to USCIS to with draw the I 485 application.
- In March 08 I get an email from USCIS stating my application is withdrawn.
I obtained the notice of withdrawal and the notice says
'As a result of your request, your application is considered withdrawn, and it will recieve no further consideration by USCIS. There is no appeal to this decision.'
Neither I nor my wife have authorized the attorney to withdraw the application, we only wanted them to withdraw their representation (I have the letter we wrote to them and it clearly states it.)
what can we do.
Is it possible to reinstate our case?
Can we refile my AOS again, even thought the primary applicants green card is approved more than 6 months ago?
Thanks for contacting IV with your SOS.
An IV core member is going to be helping you to fix this with USCIS. Let us know if you need help. He already tried contacting you yesterday.
As IV grows maybe this is a help IV can extend to all its donor members and help them if they get in such extreme distress situations. This is one of the ideas we are thinking for our members in the donor group.
Update: April 13,2009
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=24824
The problem that IV member Drifter had with his I485 application has been fixed. IV had contacted USCIS and USCIS said that they will reinstate his case.
hair Zac amp; Vanessa: Kissing on the
willigetgc?
04-19 08:09 AM
sent the letter.
we need to bring the immigration discussion to the forefront, and seize on the opportunity this election year - democrats have everything to gain from it. Lets do all we can to get bill in the senate!
we can send these letters to the president, Sens. Reid, Schumer and Graham
I am really not into my own/ or any one particular case. We need to start reignite an awareness for legal immigration overhaul. Does not matter what one's priority date is.
C'mon guys what ever has happened we need to reignite and restart the immigration torch
What can be done/ What needs to be done.... Lets do it
Can the guru's of the forum please let us know if there is a campaign we can start/restart. SOMETHING needs to be done, right now
we need to bring the immigration discussion to the forefront, and seize on the opportunity this election year - democrats have everything to gain from it. Lets do all we can to get bill in the senate!
we can send these letters to the president, Sens. Reid, Schumer and Graham
I am really not into my own/ or any one particular case. We need to start reignite an awareness for legal immigration overhaul. Does not matter what one's priority date is.
C'mon guys what ever has happened we need to reignite and restart the immigration torch
What can be done/ What needs to be done.... Lets do it
Can the guru's of the forum please let us know if there is a campaign we can start/restart. SOMETHING needs to be done, right now
more...
apatel_17
07-11 02:31 PM
No is the correct answer.. they are here as visitors (not residents - US tax returns are for US residents - tax return 101)
also they don't have SS# i presume, so how can you even think about adding them as dependents?
Good try though :)
IRS does not use the same terminology as USCIS. If you are working in the US on an H1B visa, you are a "US Resident Alien" according to IRS. Those who pass a "substantial presence" test in the US can be claimed as dependents if they do not have significant income in another country, and are not claimed as dependents by anyone else. IRS will take your tax dollars whether you have a SSN or not ;-) That's why they issue Individual Tax Identification Numbers. Dependent visa holders use the ITIN to uniquely identify themselves in tax filings.
also they don't have SS# i presume, so how can you even think about adding them as dependents?
Good try though :)
IRS does not use the same terminology as USCIS. If you are working in the US on an H1B visa, you are a "US Resident Alien" according to IRS. Those who pass a "substantial presence" test in the US can be claimed as dependents if they do not have significant income in another country, and are not claimed as dependents by anyone else. IRS will take your tax dollars whether you have a SSN or not ;-) That's why they issue Individual Tax Identification Numbers. Dependent visa holders use the ITIN to uniquely identify themselves in tax filings.
hot zac efron and vanessa hudgens
snathan
08-17 12:35 PM
If it was EB2, you have better chance of winning lotto than get EB2 approved with 3 year degree. I had 3yrs + PG Diploma + 6 Years of Indian Experience + 13 Years of US experience and I was never able to cross the labor certification hurdle. BTW, I tried 2 times.
There is a little chance if you had 3+2 years degree and the labor was looking for Bachelor�s and would accept equalent foreign degree as evaluated by reputed firm. I believe your diploma was the hurdle.
There is a little chance if you had 3+2 years degree and the labor was looking for Bachelor�s and would accept equalent foreign degree as evaluated by reputed firm. I believe your diploma was the hurdle.
more...
house zac efron and vanessa hudgens
gcdedo
10-23 03:50 PM
I-140 Filed on June 30th Still waiting to get cleared..
tattoo Zac Efron And Vanessa Hudgens
mrane1
12-21 05:04 AM
The 2001 recession was centered around the tech bubble... Except for people working in IT, most did not even feel it was recession... Infact the recession of 2001 was considered the shortest and the mildest on record... But it hit the tech industry hard which was at the center of the storm... Having learned their lesson, the IT companies paid a lot of attention to their bottomline and preserving their resources... The Ciscos, the Microsofts, the Oracles are sitting on huge piles of cash... So they have not been as quick to lay off people as other industries... So if you work in IT you might be thinking what recession? Things are fine... Just as people in Real estate and finance thought in 2001... However, if you look at the numbers it tells a different story... The peak unemployement during the 01 recession was 6.2%... This time we have already crossed 6.7% and there seems no light at the end of the tunnel... This is a much serious downturn, that will fundamentally affect US and rest of the world. I am surprised at the number of IT people thinking this is a small storm that will just pass away... Lehman Brothers, 140 year old bank just vanished one morning... Merrill Lynch gone! Thats some serious S**T!! Its like waking up one morning to find out that Microsoft does not exist anymore! Ask your friends working in finance (if you have any) and they will tell you how serious this is! The layoffs in IT are coming my friends... Hold on to your jobs like your life depended on it... Because things are about to get nasty for the IT sector too... Good luck!
more...
pictures zac efron and vanessa hudgens
cashah19
06-15 09:18 AM
I must say this is the best forum ever. You guys are simply great. It feels really good to get answers to these questions. Thanks to all of you.
At least I will have a holiday on my marriage...... :D
At least I will have a holiday on my marriage...... :D
dresses Vanessa Hudgens has decided to
raj3078
02-14 05:22 PM
Guys have any clue as to when the CIR will be taken up by the senate..do they have any kind of a calendar??.
I think Pres Bush is asking the same question.....Seems like you guys have something in common :D
I think Pres Bush is asking the same question.....Seems like you guys have something in common :D
more...
makeup zac efron and vanessa hudgens
whitecollarslave
03-19 04:05 PM
The people with Master's in STEM are expempt from the cap.
It will benefit them
H-1B cap or EB green card cap?
It will benefit them
H-1B cap or EB green card cap?
girlfriend zac efron and vanessa hudgens kissing. +vanessa+hudgens+kiss+cam
chanduv23
11-12 02:43 PM
Chandu, here I found the LINK (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html)
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
This is not new, it has been there for a while and almost everyone who googled AC21 would have read Murthy's page.
Whatever Murthy has mentioned is her opinion. Aytes memo has not been more stricter than Yates memo but has been more clear.
So lets continue to send letters
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
This is not new, it has been there for a while and almost everyone who googled AC21 would have read Murthy's page.
Whatever Murthy has mentioned is her opinion. Aytes memo has not been more stricter than Yates memo but has been more clear.
So lets continue to send letters
hairstyles zac efron and vanessa hudgens
Canadianindian
06-19 07:46 PM
Great update. The TriState will bump up their efforts.
If you live in TriState, please become a member or you will miss out on updates.
If you live in TriState, please become a member or you will miss out on updates.
learning01
05-26 07:35 AM
"This is truly landmark legislation produced by a big-league team," said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that wrote the legislation.
"The next step is going to be the conference (with the House) and I believe we can do it," Specter said. "We're going to work as hard to get a bill to the president's desk as we did to get a bill passed today. And I predict success."
LINK (http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14669011.htm)
"The next step is going to be the conference (with the House) and I believe we can do it," Specter said. "We're going to work as hard to get a bill to the president's desk as we did to get a bill passed today. And I predict success."
LINK (http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14669011.htm)
GCnightmare
12-25 11:23 AM
I have PD of April 2001 and still waiting....