villamonte6100
03-07 03:42 PM
I think your lawyer is screwing you. $7500 just for labor.
wallpaper Allen+iverson+turkey
HV000
04-02 07:58 PM
USCIS - FBI Joint Plan to Eliminate Name Check Backlogs
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
May 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 3 years
July 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 2 years
Nov 2008 - Process all name checks pending for more than 1 year
Feb 2009 - Process all name checks pending for more than 180 days
Jun 2009 - Process 98% of all name checks within 30 days and process the remaining 2% within 90 days
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/NameCheck_2Apr08.pdf
deafTunes123
09-01 11:03 AM
Thanks KevinKris for sharing the info.
Your documents represents the I-140 info.
I was trying to check what is the priority date attached to I485 application. Seems there is no such info. attached to pending I-485 application.
Also, just now I checked my 485 receipt. The PD column in my I-484 receipt is blank. Is this common for every one? Just curious?
Your documents represents the I-140 info.
I was trying to check what is the priority date attached to I485 application. Seems there is no such info. attached to pending I-485 application.
Also, just now I checked my 485 receipt. The PD column in my I-484 receipt is blank. Is this common for every one? Just curious?
2011 allen iverson stats as point
go_getter007
12-11 12:23 PM
I think it's a way to manage your own expectations - if EBn works out in a reasonable amount of time (varies from person to person), the US is a great place to be, otherwise, your own country is not all that bad. :D
GG_007
Why are you applying in EB1 then ?
GG_007
Why are you applying in EB1 then ?
more...
n_2006
10-03 12:17 PM
I have done FP on Sept 27th. no LUD so far. Same with my wife.
walking_dude
09-14 05:54 AM
My wifes' application is in the same situation (though mine is clear). I sent (through attorney) proof of check encashment from the bank and also a new check for $70.
Attoney gave these options
1) Send ONLY proof of check encashment - This could lead to delay in Processing till they find the locate the missing check and account it
2) Send proof of check + $70 - They may or may not encash the new check. If they resolve the issue without encashing the new check, it's well and good. If they do encash it and the issue is resolved - well, it's still better than her application getting rejected over $70 [ Of course MTR and other actions can be taken, but didn't think it was worth it]
Attorney response has reached them. Waiting for the change in her application status ( God only knows when it'll get changed)
Attoney gave these options
1) Send ONLY proof of check encashment - This could lead to delay in Processing till they find the locate the missing check and account it
2) Send proof of check + $70 - They may or may not encash the new check. If they resolve the issue without encashing the new check, it's well and good. If they do encash it and the issue is resolved - well, it's still better than her application getting rejected over $70 [ Of course MTR and other actions can be taken, but didn't think it was worth it]
Attorney response has reached them. Waiting for the change in her application status ( God only knows when it'll get changed)
more...
gene77
10-19 01:54 PM
My case is exactly like yours ....
1st 140 under EB3 PD Oct 04
2nd 140 under EB2 still pending, requested for EB3 PD Oct 04 to be ported - awaiting porting results.
However, since your 485 is already filed with a EB3 I140, you are requested USCIS to 'link' (for lack of better words) the new EB2 I140 with your pending I485. Per my interpretation of what I have read in Matthew Oh's website (I'll post later) and Perarson's memo, we can request this interlinking only when the PD for our 2nd I140 is current.
However your lawyer suggests differently - which may be fine and may work just as well. In fact, if your case works, then I won't wait for my PD to be current either and will interfile immediately after approval of my I-140.
here is where my confusion lies....I'm sure you must have this also.
This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the next I-140 petition.
Please share this with your attorney and update the forum members of their response.
Gene.
1st 140 under EB3 PD Oct 04
2nd 140 under EB2 still pending, requested for EB3 PD Oct 04 to be ported - awaiting porting results.
However, since your 485 is already filed with a EB3 I140, you are requested USCIS to 'link' (for lack of better words) the new EB2 I140 with your pending I485. Per my interpretation of what I have read in Matthew Oh's website (I'll post later) and Perarson's memo, we can request this interlinking only when the PD for our 2nd I140 is current.
However your lawyer suggests differently - which may be fine and may work just as well. In fact, if your case works, then I won't wait for my PD to be current either and will interfile immediately after approval of my I-140.
here is where my confusion lies....I'm sure you must have this also.
This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the next I-140 petition.
Please share this with your attorney and update the forum members of their response.
Gene.
2010 wallpaper allen iverson
waitnwatch
05-06 06:56 PM
I was wondering how L1 can be allowed instate tuition while H1-B's have to pay out of state according to the Arizona list. What exactly is the fundamental difference between the 2 which results in L1's fulfilling the requirements?
GCard Dream - You should ask the question - what part of the statute does L1 fulfil that H1B does not -
I'm sure you can give these guy's a run for their money. One thing - if you pursue it long and hard enough I think there is a chance that you can get instate tuition. The only area I was concerned about was the domicile part but if L1's can prove domicile so can H1-B's.
My son was able to get in-state tuition at Arizona State University after we filed an appeal. The new rule allows those who have filed I-485 to get in-state tuition.
http://students.asu.edu/files/Visa%20Types%20and%20Residency%20Eligibility.pdf
GCard Dream - You should ask the question - what part of the statute does L1 fulfil that H1B does not -
I'm sure you can give these guy's a run for their money. One thing - if you pursue it long and hard enough I think there is a chance that you can get instate tuition. The only area I was concerned about was the domicile part but if L1's can prove domicile so can H1-B's.
My son was able to get in-state tuition at Arizona State University after we filed an appeal. The new rule allows those who have filed I-485 to get in-state tuition.
http://students.asu.edu/files/Visa%20Types%20and%20Residency%20Eligibility.pdf
more...
cherryred50
04-10 11:55 AM
Hi I am really grateful to you all for responding to my problem. I have attached the agreement for your reference.
To Zcool,
I don't have a job right now with this vendor But in the future if the vendor finds me a job shall I work with him.
Thanks,
Uday
To Zcool,
I don't have a job right now with this vendor But in the future if the vendor finds me a job shall I work with him.
Thanks,
Uday
hair allen iverson dresses. allen
hankles
01-27 12:02 PM
And one more
-------------------------
Hello,
I'm with BCI, and I was curious if you or someone from your professional network might be interested in this opportunity:
Title: Senior C++ Developer (Job Order: DM0556-001-811)
Location: Chicago, IL
Responsibilities:
Proprietary trading firm focused on the application of advanced quantitative/algorithmic trading methods in financial markets seeks a Senior C++ Developer to assist in their high frequency trading operations. Current members of the team include experts in statistical modeling/machine learning/computer science/software development.
The primary responsibilities of this role will be to aid in research efforts.
They use Microsoft Windows, Visual C++, MFC and STL.
Experience:
Minimum 2-5+ years industry experience required
BS or MS in Computer Science is required
Strong background in object oriented programming/software development required
Programming using Visual C++ and MFC required
Experience with SQL and C# is a strong plus
Experience with any of the following would be strongly preferred: real-time systems/code optimization/numerical methods/scientific computing
Scripting experience using Python a plus
If you are interested in this opening, please email us a copy of your resume as an MS Word attachment.
-------------------------
-------------------------
Hello,
I'm with BCI, and I was curious if you or someone from your professional network might be interested in this opportunity:
Title: Senior C++ Developer (Job Order: DM0556-001-811)
Location: Chicago, IL
Responsibilities:
Proprietary trading firm focused on the application of advanced quantitative/algorithmic trading methods in financial markets seeks a Senior C++ Developer to assist in their high frequency trading operations. Current members of the team include experts in statistical modeling/machine learning/computer science/software development.
The primary responsibilities of this role will be to aid in research efforts.
They use Microsoft Windows, Visual C++, MFC and STL.
Experience:
Minimum 2-5+ years industry experience required
BS or MS in Computer Science is required
Strong background in object oriented programming/software development required
Programming using Visual C++ and MFC required
Experience with SQL and C# is a strong plus
Experience with any of the following would be strongly preferred: real-time systems/code optimization/numerical methods/scientific computing
Scripting experience using Python a plus
If you are interested in this opening, please email us a copy of your resume as an MS Word attachment.
-------------------------
more...
desi485
11-12 02:34 PM
Here is another link posted below, published just 2 days back.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/80818
In the absence of governing regulations, there is a lot of grey area and wide divergence of practice for how employers and employees handle AOS portability situations. However, USCIS expects to publish regulations governing AC-21 that purport to address these issues in the near future.
Can IV CORE address this issue ASAP with CIS??? I know speaking (or rather typing) is simple than doing it, but I am sure there must be some efforts going on in background.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/80818
In the absence of governing regulations, there is a lot of grey area and wide divergence of practice for how employers and employees handle AOS portability situations. However, USCIS expects to publish regulations governing AC-21 that purport to address these issues in the near future.
Can IV CORE address this issue ASAP with CIS??? I know speaking (or rather typing) is simple than doing it, but I am sure there must be some efforts going on in background.
hot When Allen Iverson(notes)
rb_248
01-07 02:01 PM
Satyam in tamil means truth. However, the company CEO is now known for Fraud......how ironic.
more...
house PHILADELPHIA -- Allen Iverson
slowwin
03-03 02:25 PM
how do i create a new thread ?
tattoo allen iverson wife.
pappu
08-31 09:17 AM
if only we knew about this program in advance, we could've called. :mad:
Yes. Even I did not know it. I was trying to find out if Cspan was showing the hearings in Dallas and found this. I immediately tried calling the lines but they all seemed busy. There were some callers who were criticizing foreign high skilled immigrants and that jobs were being taken away from them and wages were being lowered and they are being allowed to come and stay in the country.
Lets see how the hearings go in Dallas. FYI IV has tried contacting the speakers in the hearing.
Yes. Even I did not know it. I was trying to find out if Cspan was showing the hearings in Dallas and found this. I immediately tried calling the lines but they all seemed busy. There were some callers who were criticizing foreign high skilled immigrants and that jobs were being taken away from them and wages were being lowered and they are being allowed to come and stay in the country.
Lets see how the hearings go in Dallas. FYI IV has tried contacting the speakers in the hearing.
more...
pictures hot allen iverson tattoos
lostinbeta
01-03 12:28 PM
Oh Please... no more shakespeare :hangover: I hated his stuff in school, there is no reason I can't hate his stuff now. Too much thinking involved... thinking is bad!!!!
dresses Oct at theallen iverson
legal_alien_007
05-23 11:48 AM
On a side note, I've never understood people being so eager to get married.. May be happiness is not the only thing that matters.. :D
Good luck my friend
Good luck my friend
more...
makeup to quitquot; -- Allen Iverson
andy garcia
08-24 09:37 AM
FP notice will come later.
If you send photos for EAD(paper filed I765) no need to have FP taken.
Only when you e-file I765, you will get a FP appointment.
BTW, what purpose do the fingerprints do on an EAD?
If you send photos for EAD(paper filed I765) no need to have FP taken.
Only when you e-file I765, you will get a FP appointment.
BTW, what purpose do the fingerprints do on an EAD?
girlfriend allen iverson
arnab221
09-22 11:04 AM
With the kind of response I saw at the House judicary commitee inspite f making all those calls . I now realize where we are on their priority list , below horses .
Sorry for the sarcasm , I am pretty bitter about the whole thing now after 2 repeated delays .
Sorry for the sarcasm , I am pretty bitter about the whole thing now after 2 repeated delays .
hairstyles allen iverson football
bsbawa10
07-23 02:55 PM
USCIS needs to work with paper files for review/approval. RD as on your receipt is the mailroom receive date. Real receive date of a processing center is when they actually opened your file and entered in the system, which is what you see online as, "...your case was received on...". Processing centers prefer to treat this date as RD as this suites them better. In your case your true RD should be a couple of days prior to your ND. Who is responsible for the 4 months period in between when several thousand applications may have been received and entered in the system (and placed ahead of you)? Nobody.
babawa10: Your case has shuffled around between centers. It was received last by TSC in Aug 08. Therefore, don't get surprized if your Real RD is now Aug 08. USCIS makes a simple claim, they process cases in order they receive them. Perhaps they are talking about the paper files, which are placed in sequence on shelves as they arrive. Check online what it now says for "...your case was received on...".
My case status online does not say anything about when it was received. It just says, "This case is now pending at the office to which it was transferred.". There is so much ambiguity at USCIS that it takes tons of reading / pulling hair just to understand what they mean. They have transferred my case three times. First of all there should be a reason for it (no reason makes it you wonder why ??) , then if they keep transferring it from one center to another, does that mean that the "received date" will be changing for ever and the case will never be processed ? I think USCIS should be accountable for that.
babawa10: Your case has shuffled around between centers. It was received last by TSC in Aug 08. Therefore, don't get surprized if your Real RD is now Aug 08. USCIS makes a simple claim, they process cases in order they receive them. Perhaps they are talking about the paper files, which are placed in sequence on shelves as they arrive. Check online what it now says for "...your case was received on...".
My case status online does not say anything about when it was received. It just says, "This case is now pending at the office to which it was transferred.". There is so much ambiguity at USCIS that it takes tons of reading / pulling hair just to understand what they mean. They have transferred my case three times. First of all there should be a reason for it (no reason makes it you wonder why ??) , then if they keep transferring it from one center to another, does that mean that the "received date" will be changing for ever and the case will never be processed ? I think USCIS should be accountable for that.
thomachan72
03-01 07:28 AM
Very interesting. I thought affidavit from the mother or father along with a letter of non-availibility of birth certificate should be Ok.
Ofcourse the non-availibility is usally given in a piece of paper and not any official letter head. There might / might not even be an official seal in many cases.
Would be interesting to see what others think about your issue.
Ofcourse the non-availibility is usally given in a piece of paper and not any official letter head. There might / might not even be an official seal in many cases.
Would be interesting to see what others think about your issue.
meridiani.planum
04-03 02:13 PM
can someone explain it again in simpler terms ..does the above mean that if a 485 is pending then that person is not out of status (or unlawful presence) till a decision is made on the pending 485 ?
if you re-enter the US on an AP, they give you an I-94 with teh same date of expiry as your AP expiry (within 1 year). AILA was wondering if USCIS could come out with a memo clarifying that essentially that I-94 has no meaning, if you are in the US after it expires, you are still within status (because you have a 485 pending, and that gives you status until the decision is made on it)
if you re-enter the US on an AP, they give you an I-94 with teh same date of expiry as your AP expiry (within 1 year). AILA was wondering if USCIS could come out with a memo clarifying that essentially that I-94 has no meaning, if you are in the US after it expires, you are still within status (because you have a 485 pending, and that gives you status until the decision is made on it)